<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Katrina Karkazis &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.katrinakarkazis.com/category/uncategorized/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.katrinakarkazis.com</link>
	<description>notes on medicine, mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Doctors Can&#8217;t Discriminate (at least in California)</title>
		<link>http://www.katrinakarkazis.com/doctors-cant-discriminate-at-least-in-california/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.katrinakarkazis.com/doctors-cant-discriminate-at-least-in-california/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katrina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lesbian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katrinakarkazis.com/doctors_cant_discriminate_a.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
On Monday the California Supreme Court rule unanimously ruled that doctors cannot refuse to medical care for gays and lesbians based on the physicians&#8217; religious beliefs. The constitutional right to exercise free religion does not allow businesses to skirt California state law prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
The case that led to this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><span class="drop_cap">O</span>n Monday the California Supreme Court rule unanimously ruled that doctors cannot refuse to medical care for gays and lesbians based on the physicians&#8217; religious beliefs. The constitutional right to exercise free religion does not allow businesses to skirt California state law prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.</p>
<p>The case that led to this ruling began in 1999 when Guadalupe Benitez, a lesbian,  went to two doctors for fertility treatments. Both doctors refused to help her become inseminated claiming it was because she was unmarried and that doing so violated their religious beliefs. Benitez sued the physicians and won in 2004. That decision was overturned in 2005. This decision overturns that ruling. So basically the constitutional right to freedom of religion cannot override California&#8217;s anti-discrimination law, which bars businesses from arbitrarily discriminating against clients based on characteristics such as race, age, and sexual orientation (marital status was added to the list in 2006). Quite simply, the doctor&#8217;s office is no place for discrimination. That&#8217;s how it should be.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katrinakarkazis.com/doctors-cant-discriminate-at-least-in-california/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vagina Spa?</title>
		<link>http://www.katrinakarkazis.com/vagina-spa/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.katrinakarkazis.com/vagina-spa/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katrina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genital spa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genital surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odd bits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katrinakarkazis.com/vagina_spa.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s hard to believe, but the New York Times has a piece on spas for the genitals. It&#8217;s called phit, which stands for pelvic health integrated techniques. The spa will offer standard gynecological services, but, as you can imagine, it&#8217;s also got plenty to make women feel their genitals are unsightly and inadequate as is. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>It&#8217;s hard to believe, but the New York Times has a piece on <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/03/fashion/03SkinOne.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.nytimes.com');" target="_blank">spas for the genitals</a>. It&#8217;s called phit, which stands for pelvic health integrated techniques. The spa will offer standard gynecological services, but, as you can imagine, it&#8217;s also got plenty to make women feel their genitals are unsightly and inadequate as is. Indeed, women who aren&#8217;t into keeping their pelvis fit may well suffer from a vagina that is &#8220;almost scrotal, very wrinkly and lax.&#8221; I am not sure what&#8217;s worse, the spa, or that the Times covered it.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katrinakarkazis.com/vagina-spa/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
